Cerberus blocks the lethal trifecta at the tool boundary — see the 525-run evidence set.

Solution

The questionnaire tells you what a vendor claimed on the day they answered it

Third-party risk fails in the gap between onboarding and the next review. Shorten the questionnaire, then keep watching the posture that actually changes.

Assessment is a snapshot of a moving target

A vendor is assessed once, filed, and re-examined a year later. In between, their architecture changed, they adopted AI, and nobody told you.

  1. Questionnaires take weeksThe same evidence is requested in a slightly different format by every customer, and answering it is a full-time job on both sides.
  2. No signal between reviewsNothing watches the vendor's posture once the assessment is filed.
  3. Their AI is now your exposureA vendor adding an AI feature changes where your data goes, without changing the contract you assessed.

With Odingard, you can

Cut questionnaire turnaround

Answer from an evidence library that is already current, rather than assembling a fresh pack per requester.

Publish posture once

A Trust Center gives prospects and customers a self-service view of controls and evidence instead of an email thread.

Track vendor AI as inventory

The AI systems a vendor introduces are recorded against the obligations they affect, not discovered at renewal.

What delivers it

Warden · By Odingard

Have Warden operate the program

Warden builds the assessment workflow, runs evidence operations, and keeps the crosswalk current as your vendor obligations change.

Go deeper

Assess faster, then keep watching

The onboarding assessment is the easy half. The value is in what you know about the vendor six months later.