Cerberus blocks the lethal trifecta at the tool boundary — see the 525-run evidence set.

Warden · Deployment

The engagement should end with your team not needing us

Role-specific training and enablement for the people who will operate what we deployed — engineers writing policy, compliance staff running the program, and the executives who have to answer for both.

Generic AI training does not change behavior

A course on AI risk delivered to everyone produces awareness and no change in practice. The teams shipping agents need something specific to the systems they are building and the controls they now have to work inside.

  1. Engineers need the failure modesInjection, tool abuse and exfiltration paths, demonstrated against systems that resemble theirs.
  2. Compliance staff need the platformHow to operate control monitoring and evidence day to day, not a product overview.
  3. Executives need the questionsWhat to ask a team proposing an agent, and what a good answer sounds like.

How enablement runs

1

Audience mapping

Who needs what, at what depth, and what they should be able to do afterwards.

2

Tailor the material

Built around your architecture and your policy set rather than a generic curriculum.

3

Deliver

Workshops for engineers, operational training for compliance staff, briefings for leadership.

4

Leave the materials

You keep the content and can run it again for new joiners without us.

What you hold at the end

  • Role-specific training built on your architecture and policy set
  • Hands-on engineering workshops covering agent failure modes and the controls in place
  • Operational training for the compliance team on the deployed platform
  • A leadership briefing on what to ask before approving an agent
  • The materials, yours to re-run for new joiners

Capability, not dependency

We would rather be brought back for the next problem than retained to operate the last one.