Discovery and plan
Current state, data to migrate, integrations required and a cutover plan with a rollback position.
Warden · Deployment
Migrations fail on the data and the cutover, not on the product
Implementation of the Odingard platform, including migration from whatever you are replacing — control sets, historical evidence and open items — with continuous coverage across the cutover.
The incumbent holds history you still need
Replacing a compliance platform means moving control definitions, evidence with dates attached and work in flight — and an auditor will ask about the period that spans both systems.
- Evidence has to keep its datesMigrated artifacts that lose their original timestamps are substantially less useful at audit.
- Coverage cannot lapseA monitoring gap during cutover becomes an exception you have to explain.
- Adoption decides the outcomeA migrated platform nobody uses is a more expensive version of the problem you started with.
How the implementation runs
Configure
Tenancy, roles, control library, connectors and integrations against your environment.
Migrate
Move controls, evidence and open items with original dates and attribution preserved.
Parallel run and cutover
Both systems live until posture matches, then cutover with coverage documented across the boundary.
What you hold at the end
- A configured production tenant with roles and integrations in place
- Migrated controls and evidence with original dates and attribution preserved
- A parallel-run reconciliation showing posture matched before cutover
- A documented coverage statement spanning the migration period
- Trained administrators and a support path
What is implemented
No gap in the record
The measure of a good migration is that the audit after it never has to discuss the migration.